Never let a Crisis go to Waste

Ruvan J Grobler • March 31, 2026

In a quiet corner of a garden, a tiny egg rested beneath a leaf, unnoticed by the world. In time, it hatched into a caterpillar—small, vulnerable, and endlessly hungry. Day after day, it consumed everything in its path, growing rapidly but remaining earthbound, exposed to every passing threat.


Then, without warning, it stopped.


It found a still place, attached itself to a branch, and formed a chrysalis. From the outside, it looked lifeless—fragile, even pointless. To an observer, it might have seemed like the end of its journey. But inside, everything was changing. The caterpillar was breaking down completely, dissolving into something unrecognizable before slowly rebuilding itself into something entirely new.


Time passed.


When the chrysalis finally opened, the creature that emerged was no longer confined to the ground. Its wings were soft at first, uncertain. It struggled, pushing fluid through them, strengthening them with effort. Only after this resistance could it take flight.


And when it did, it soared—no longer bound by the limitations of its former life but shaped by every stage that came before.


It’s been six years since humanity’s last global threat, the Covid pandemic. A lot has changed, but we as people have not. Just as the butterfly in the story above goes through its cycle the global economy does too. But the butterfly does not know its going through this cycle, its merely following its path. We are very aware of the cycle as it has an effect on our every day lives especially on our finances. But just as the butterfly follows its path, we do too.

 

Focus on what you can control.

We often stress the issues out of our own control and isn’t exclusive to finances. Not a single person reading this article has any control of the global economy and the current conflict in the Middle East. None of us also knew exactly when it would happen and when it is going to end. Don’t get me wrong, I too struggle to manage my thoughts and emotions when we go through the tough parts.

 

Shifting the focus towards finances; except for being in control of how you earn an income, the only other factor you can control is your spending. Stick to your budget! Never stop investing! Stay disciplined!

 

Crisis Asset Allocation

I get many questions on what we are doing to manage risk and potential losses. This is where financial planning becomes extremely important. Every single investment in your portfolio is linked to a need or a goal, not just any goal but a time-based goal. This specific time horizon has influenced the type of assets bought in order to reach these goals. The longer away the goal, the more risk is taken and vice versa.

 

Investments where liquidity is needed will be affected much less than a long-term share portfolio. More liquidity, less risk. Meaning that if you need cashflow you should not be worried as the asset exposure will be less affected. Retirement products will have exposure to many different assets where there are conservative assets to provide protection in the short-term. The growth asset exposure that may be volatile now is the part that gives you the long-term inflation beating returns.

 

During this part of the cycle certain assets have become less desirable and opportunities have popped up elsewhere. All portfolios are monitored to make sure that the original mandate is followed, and the investment goal is reached at the end of the applicable term.

 

All asset managers have started to make asset allocation changes to match the changing of the cycle and the Bovest investment committee has also done so.

 

Is it time to sell and move to cash?

In short, no. We don’t know when markets will turn and no one else either. Historically in these crises it takes on average around two weeks to reach the bottom of the market and then more than a month to recover. This does create many buying opportunities for asset managers but also for you as investor. Warren Buffet always says, "Be fearful when others are greedy and greedy when others are fearful". This is the time to buy assets on “sale”, don’t sell them.

 

Getting out of the market is the biggest risk, this is where investors lose money. Stick to the plan and stay patient, you will be rewarded.

 

Ruvan J Grobler RFP™ (PGDip Financial Planning)


By PJ Botha • November 3, 2026
In conversations with people, and increasingly in the media, I hear the same message: “Just put everything in the S&P 500. Over time, it will all balance out.” There is sound reasoning behind investing in a broad share index over several decades. But that advice can overlook something important: your investment horizon and your ability to stay invested when markets fall. Even investors with decades ahead may need some of their money much sooner. During the dot-com crash, the S&P 500 fell approximately 49% from its peak in 2000 to its low in 2002. Imagine watching an investment of 1 million fall to roughly 510,000, excluding dividends and currency movements. It is easy to say you would remain invested; experiencing it can feel very different. Even the eventual winners suffered. Amazon’s share price fell approximately 94% between December 1999 and September 2001. An investment of $100,000 would temporarily have been worth around $6,000. Amazon survived and eventually flourished, but other businesses did not: Webvan and eToys entered bankruptcy in 2001, with shareholders facing the loss of their entire investment. Recovery is possible for a broad market; it is never assured for an individual company. If you need to draw an income, fund a major expense or simply find the losses unbearable, you may be forced—or tempted—to sell before markets recover. Different markets followed different paths. While US shares struggled, the JSE All Share initially rose approximately 52% between March 2000 and May 2002, before falling around 37% by April 2003. At that low, it was approximately 4% below its March 2000 starting level, excluding dividends. South Africa provided diversification, but its market still experienced a substantial decline along the way. Bonds also played an important role. Over the three calendar years from 2000 to 2002, US 10-year Treasury bonds delivered a cumulative return of approximately 42% in dollars, while South Africa’s All Bond Index returned approximately 63% in rand, including reinvested income. These are full-period returns, rather than peak-to-trough figures, but they show how different asset classes can support a portfolio when shares struggle. The Rand added another layer. It started 2000 at approximately R6.12 to the dollar and weakened dramatically, briefly reaching around R13.85 in December 2001. It subsequently recovered, briefly revisiting roughly R6.10 in December 2003 and trading around those levels again in July 2004. Rand weakness initially cushioned offshore losses for South African investors; the subsequent strengthening worked in the opposite direction. Moving offshore after a sharp currency decline can therefore introduce its own risks. Artificial intelligence (AI) is creating exciting opportunities today. The internet boom offers a useful reminder: a technology can change the world without every investment in it delivering a good return. The price paid and the expectations built into that price still matter. This does not mean a similar crash is imminent, or that investors should avoid the S&P 500. It means that an investment can be a useful part of a portfolio without being the right place for all your money. At Bovest, we build portfolios around your goals, income needs and investment horizon. Diversification across companies, sectors, countries, currencies and asset classes cannot prevent every loss, but it can reduce dependence on one outcome. The best portfolio is one that supports your financial goals—and that you can live with when markets become uncomfortable.
November 3, 2026
Die spoed en omvang waarteen inligting en ontledings in ons moderne tyd aangebied word, is verstommend. Ons hoef nie meer ure in biblioteke te sit om navorsing te doen nie. Die internet en kunsmatige intelligensie kan ingewikkelde onderwerpe verduidelik, uiteenlopende menings saamvat en ontledings aanbied. Hierteenoor leef ons in een van die mees problematiese tydperke van die wêreldgeskiedenis – geo-politieke verhoudinge is kompleks en gespanne en Westerse lande ervaar uiteenlopende intense uitdagings. Help al die inligting en ontledings ons noodwendig om beter besluite te neem? Ek dink nie so nie. Daar is een vermoë wat die internet nie kan bied nie - dit is menslike wysheid. Die Griekse filosoof, Socrates, sê hoe slimmer ons word hoe meer besef ons hoe min ons eintlik werklik weet: “Ek weet dat ek nie weet nie”. Miskien is dit die eerste teken van wysheid om nie deurgans antwoorde te hê nie, maar om eerder beter vrae te vra. Wysheid is nie om alles te weet nie, maar om te weet wat werklik saak maak. Dan kom ons weer terug by die kernvraag wat ons deesdae moet vra: “Maak die beskikbaarheid van kennis ons noodwendig wyser.” Nie noodwendig nie. Kennis gee vir ons feite en ontledings; wysheid vra egter meer. Dit vra besinning, oordeel, perspektief, selfkennis uit ervaring, en die vermoë om te onderskei tussen wat ons kan doen en wat ons behoort te doen. ‘n Mens kan boeke oor verlies lees, maar die dood van ‘n geliefde leer jou iets wat geen ontleding volledig kan oordra nie. Daar is ook ‘n oënskynlike verband tussen ouderdom en wysheid Ouderdom waarborg nie noodwendig wysheid nie. Sommige mense word oud sonder om besinnende vrae te vra en sonder om ooit uit hul foute te leer. Ervaring, daarteenoor, wat gekoppel is aan nadenke en selfondersoek, bring ‘n soort insig wat nie bloot uit die versameling van feite ontstaan nie. In die Bybelse boek, Spreuke, word wysheid in ‘n groter morele raamwerk geplaas. Kennis behoort met nederigheid, insig en verantwoordelike vermeng te word. Miskien is dit die paradoks van ons tyd: ons beskik oor al hoe meer antwoorde, maar die belangrikste vrae bly op ‘n menslike vlak. Wat is reg? Wat is genoeg? Wanneer moet ek swyg? Hierdie vrae vra meer as inligting. Hulle vra lewenservaring en insig. Die uitdaging van ons tyd is dus nie om meer kennis te versamel nie, maar om te leer hoe om dit wys te gebruik. Want kennis kan ons help om die wêreld te verander. Wysheid help jou om te besluit watter verandering die moeite werd is. Die kern van ons samelewinguitdagings in die tydperk waarin ons lewe is in werklikheid ‘n spanning tussen ons tegnologiese vermoëns en ons menslike vermoë om sinvol te oordeel. Ons het vandag dalk beter instrumente as ooit tevore, maar dit beteken nie dat ons noodwendig beter besluite neem, meer begrip vir mekaar het of gelukkiger saamleef nie. Hoe meer ek van die lewe leer, hoe minder klink absolute sekerheid na wysheid. Geskryf deur Koos van die Waterberge vir Bovest